Can Vaccines Cause Brain Damage

FDA documents from 2002 admit that regular toxicity studies in animals with vaccine ingredients such as aluminum adjuvants were never performed since it was assumed that these ingredients are safe.

How Vaccine Adjuvants Affect Your Brain

Countries with the heaviest vaccines schedules have higher autism rates compared with countries that do not immunize children with as numerous vaccines.

Engaging evidence shows the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine can raise your risk of brain autoimmune conditions, such as multiple sclerosis (MS).

Research reveals that repeated stimulation with the same antigen overcomes the genetic resistance to autoimmunity. So by giving regular booster shots, you break your tolerance to autoimmunity.Vaccination and AutismBy Dr. Mercola

Vaccination and Autism

Vaccine safety is definitely a highly controversial subject this year, and in this interview, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic helps clarify an important element of this discussion, which is how vaccines can damage your brain.

Dr. Tomljenovic is a post-doctoral fellow at the University of British Columbia (UBC), where she operates in neurosciences and the Department of Medicine.

” The reason why I got thinking about this area is [since] there is an absence of research demonstrating safety,” she states.

It’s extremely simple to claim that the item is safe if you’re using a comparator that naturally might be harmful.”

Another factor that activated her uncertainty about what was being reported in the peer-reviewed literature was her coming face to face with scientific corruption. A former boss really asked her to falsify information on an experiment they were performing with statin drugs.

They were testing a cholesterol-lowering medication in mice, and more mice were dying from the statin treatment than from water.

” When the result came, my boss informed me to ignore the dead mice from the statistics, since it wouldn’t look good on the drug. I thought to myself, ‘I didn’t get a PhD degree to lie to earn money,’ so I quit my task,” she states.

” I began questioning what else have we been sold in sciences that were dodgy information … My manager was receiving cash from the drug business, and undoubtedly they would have not given more cash to a laboratory that published undesirable reports about their drugs.”

Aluminum Adjuvants Are Falsely Assumed Safe

… when checking vaccines, she recommends increasing their sales as a primary motivating aspect.

It’s sobering to realize that when the aluminum adjuvant wased initially authorized for use in vaccines, some 90 years earlier, it was authorized because of efficacy. It was never actually tested for safety. Even the overall permitted limitation was based upon effectiveness data, not safety information. They simply presumed it was safe.

” I have a document from 2002 from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) … discussing the evaluation of vaccine active ingredients … and screening particularly in animal designs,” she states.

At that time, the FDA specified that the routine toxicity research studies in animals with vaccine ingredients have not been conducted since it was assumed that these ingredients are safe. When I check out that I was type of pulling my hairs out [thinking] ‘So, this is your unassailable evidence of safety?’

These files never made it to traditional media. It’s simply a lie perpetuated over and over once again; that we’ve been using these things for over nine decades and it’s been shown safe. No, it’s been presumed safe.”

This file is easily offered. On pages 11 and 12 of this document, titled: Workshop on Non-Clinical Safety Evaluation of Preventive Vaccines: Recent Advances and Regulatory Considerations, it says: “Historically, the non-clinical safety evaluation for preventive vaccines has actually typically not included toxicity research studies in animal models. This is since vaccines have not been viewed as inherently hazardous.

In contrast to a lot of drugs and biological products that are mostly developed to treat ill patients, vaccines primarily are given to great deals of healthy individuals, oftentimes primarily healthy infants and children. And this locations substantial focus on their safety.”

So we see it is just empty talk. They state safety is of great value, but then they go on accrediting products that have not been sufficiently checked.

See also: What are the DANGERS of Vaccination?

Why Are Aluminum Adjuvants Used in Vaccines?

You may question why aluminum is used in vaccines as an adjuvant in the first place. An adjuvant is a representative or compound created to increase your immune response.

Now, your immune response is subdivided into two immune reactions: the humoral immune reaction and the cellular innate immune reaction. The adjuvant only increases your humoral resistance. It does not impact your cellular natural resistance.

The challenge is that there’s actually no good testing system for the inherent immune system, however they technically can determine antibody response. So that’s what’s being used.

Aluminum is extremely efficiently able to increase antibodies. However that doesn’t appear to in fact enhance long-lasting immune reactions to infections and disease, which is what the majority of people think of vaccines will do.

What many fail to understand is that vaccines just work short-term for one element of the immune system, not the overall body immune system.

When you get a wild, obtained infection, it does promote the natural immune system, which is how you end up with long-term life-long immunity once you’ve recovered. This never ever happens with a vaccine.

” The issue is that individuals are being persuaded into this idea that high antibody titers equivalent security against diseases, and it’s simply not true,” Dr. Tomljenovic states.

” Proof of that are cases where you get outbreaks of transmittable illness in fully immunized populations, where over 95 percent are immunized, and they still get the disease.

The other side will constantly state, “We need to increase the boosters.” Does it ever occur to these individuals that these disease break outs might be [occurring] since [the vaccine] is refraining from doing what they believe it should be doing?”

See also: What are the Side Effects of the Anthrax Vaccine?

Rates of Autism Have Risen in Tandem with Vaccine Burden

Together with Christopher Shaw, a professor in the department of ophthalmology and visual sciences at UBC who also chairs the CMSRI’s clinical advisory board, Dr. Tomljenovic has actually published a number of papers that recommend aluminum-containing vaccines might be risky.

Not remarkably, their work has actually been heavily slammed. The UBC, however, has safeguarded and supports Shaw’s and Tomljenovic’s work on aluminum toxicity. So what does their research show that has everyone in such a tizzy?

” In the original study we gathered data that’s offered from the US Department of Education about autism rates in the last number of decades. We have done a similar analysis looking at autism rates in different other countries like UK and the Scandinavian countries.

We found that the countries that have the heaviest vaccines schedule (the children are vaccinated with a variety of vaccines) have higher autism rates compared to nations that do not immunize children with as numerous vaccines.

If you take a look at the temporal pattern in the United States, you see a significant connection over the last three years in between the number of vaccines and autism rates. The autism numbers have been increasing. They constantly say it’s only due to the fact that the diagnosis of autism is much better.

But that’s a fake argument due to the fact that simply in the last 5 years there’s been about a 70 percent increase in autism. This is not due to much better diagnostic requirements, and it sure isn’t really a hereditary epidemic, because genes in a population do not change in a five-year period. These arguments are simply silly,” she says.

Connections such as these do not show causation, nevertheless. To prove a plausible theory, you have to actually test it, to see if the theory holds. At present, the animal design is the best method to do this, as massive screening of hazardous substances on people is unethical. This sort of toxicity research on animals must have been done prior to approval, however it wasn’t. There’s likewise a large-enough pool of unvaccinated children that might be used to compare health results. As kept in mind by Dr. Tomljenovic, this kind of comparative research likewise must have been done but hasn’t:

” They need to’ve checked vaccinated versus non-vaccinated, the population of vaccinated kids versus non-vaccinated kids, and assessed the health results. But that research study has actually never ever been done due to the fact that it has actually been claimed that it’s dishonest not to give children vaccines. Well, again, that’s an assumption. If you claim that, don’t call me a quack researcher, due to the fact that your science is quack also, due to the fact that you’re putting out presumptions. They’re untried. The same opts for safety.”

Animal Study Demonstrates Harm of Aluminum Adjuvant

In among their studies, Shaw and Tomljenovic injected mice with aluminum at the comparable dosage provided to American children through vaccines, and they spaced out the injections based upon the mice’s developmental stages.

(On a side note, to learn how much aluminum you or your child really receives from various vaccines, see this vaccine excipients list.) What they discovered was that as soon as the mice reached adulthood (which occurs at the age of 6 months), the treated mice had irreversible behavioral impairments.

There was a considerable increase in anxiety and a reduction in exploratory habits. There was likewise a reduction in social interactions in between the mice. “That was a huge confirmation that our preliminary presumption or connection [between the number of vaccines and rising autism rates] might be something more than just connection,” she states.

After that, the duo went on to do some gene-based studies, specifically taking a look at the expression of genes in the mouse brain. They selected 17 prospect genes that are associated with neural function and immune response, and sought to see if there was any change in their expression either at the gene level or the protein level. Here, they found:

  • A substantial increase in growth necrosis element alpha (TNF-alpha) interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), and a chemokine called macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), which is a macrophage-attracting element. These are a sign of an inflammatory response in the adult mouse brain.
  • A substantial decrease in a neurotransmitter called acetylcholinesterase (AChE), which is related to depression and anxiety.


Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Health and Welfare