What are the Causes of Autism in a Child?

The first conjugate vaccine, against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), was authorized for use in the United States in 1988, which accompanies a significant increase in reported frequency of autism spectrum disorders amongst American children.

Is Alarming Rise in Autism Linked to 1988 Event?

Scientist hypothesize that the Hib vaccine may remain in part accountable for this increase in autism, as conjugate vaccines appear to have an extensive influence on neural development. These vaccines “essentially change the manner where the body immune systems of babies and little ones operate,” the authors of a recent research study say.

According to Barbara Loe Fisher with the NVIC, the “one cause” hypothesis, while hassle-free, is not likely to resolve the autism issue and may even be disadvantageous, as vaccine injury and death can be caused by a number of co-factors, including age, health status, family history, and types and varieties of vaccines given up combination, simply to name a few.DNA of a cell

By Dr. Mercola

In 1988, the first conjugate vaccine was approved for use in the U.S.

It was meant to safeguard babies and children against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib); a bacterial infection that can cause pneumonia, infections of your blood, joints, bones, and pericardium.

Historically, it has actually likewise been a leading cause of bacterial meningitis.

Since that time, the vaccine has actually been approved in many developed countries, consisting of Denmark and Israel where the vaccine was added to their national vaccine programs in 1993 and 1994, respectively.

Beginning in the late 1980’s, there was a significant increase in the reported frequency of autism spectrum disorders amongst children in the U.S.

A similar increase was seen in Denmark and Israel.

While the increase might be a reflection of “ascertainment predispositions,” scientists now suggest the Hib vaccine might be another trigger. The extension of the pattern toward increased rates of autism spectrum conditions might be more discussed by the increased usage of the vaccine.

What are the Causes of Autism in a Child?

According to a current study in the journal Medical Hypotheses:

It is assumed here that the intro of the Hib conjugate vaccine in the United States in 1988 and its subsequent introduction in Denmark and Israel might describe a substantial portion of the initial boosts in ASDs in those countries.

The extension of the pattern toward increased rates of ASDs could be further described by increased usage of the vaccine, a change in 1990 in the recommended age of vaccination in the United States from 15 to 2months, increased immunogenicity of the vaccine through changes in its provider protein, and the subsequent introduction of the conjugate vaccine for Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Although conjugate vaccines have been highly efficient in securing babies and children from the substantial morbidity and mortality caused by Hib and S. pneumoniae, the possible impacts of conjugate vaccines on neural development benefit close assessment.

Conjugate vaccines fundamentally change the manner in which the body immune systems of infants and children function by deviating their immune responses to the targeted carbohydrate antigens from a state of hypo-responsiveness to a robust B2 B cell mediated reaction.

Why Pinning Autism on a Particular Vaccine May Be Counterproductive …

According to Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the non-profit National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), vaccine injury is the result of an unique interaction between the host and the type and varieties of vaccines provided to that individual.

To puts it simply, vaccine injury and death is caused by a number of co-factors, including:

  • Age at the time of vaccination.
  • Personal or family history of brain and body immune system dysfunction (allergies, autoimmunity, seizures, etc.)
  • Health status at the time of vaccination (corresponding severe or chronic disease).
  • Individual and/or family history of vaccine responses.
  • Types and varieties of vaccines offered the day after an initial response happened.
  • Types and numbers of vaccines offered prior to experiencing a vaccine reaction.

There is a propensity by researchers investigating vaccine injury and death to want to indicate “one” cause as the factor for a person’s vaccine response, or population-based chronic disease frequency. Various hypotheses have been forwarded by various people concerning the link between vaccines and the significant increase in autism over the past few decades.

  • Harris Coulter and Barbara Loe Fisher were the first to point to the entire cell pertussis vaccine, which can cause mental retardation labeled as “autism” in some children.
  • In 1998, Andy Wakefield recommended a link in between autism and the live infection measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.
  • Mercury (thimerosal) preservatives in inactivated vaccines have been repeatedly linked by various professionals, as has the mix of MMR vaccine and thimerosal in vaccines.
  • According to Dr. David Ayoub, a radiologist and physician who has actually become a specialist on the additives and preservatives used in vaccines, aluminum adjuvants might be an even higher element than thimerosal.

The “sole cause” hypothesis is practical since it is simple and easy to comprehend. It is likewise much easier for individuals to believe that action can be required to “resolve” the issue if there is just one cause; i.e., separate the MMR vaccine into single doses; take thimerosal or aluminum out of the vaccines, and so forth.

However, the issue with promoting the “sole cause” hypothesis when it pertains to vaccination is that the increase in chronic disease and disability amongst our children, including autism, is most likely caused by a multiple factors in any number of mixes. For that reason, by trying to hone in on simply one cause, we’re likely to fail in our efforts to suppress this epidemic.

Why We Must Broaden Our Scope and Address Multiple Co-Factors

Ultimately, concentrating on “one cause” does little bit more than cause confusion when that theoretical cause turns out to be lacking or inaccurate. Furthermore, there’s a danger of entirely dismissing one potential cause after the other, as each potential cause cannot be shown absolutely causative. As a result, we might end up doing too little, or absolutely nothing, to remove the various co-factors that might be working in tandem to, ultimately, produce autism.

In addition to the vaccine-related elements simply pointed out, there countless other potential co-factors that can not yet be discounted, consisting of:

  • Genetically customized foods.
  • Fluoride over-exposure.
  • Ecological toxic substances of all kinds.
  • Mercury amalgams.
  • Processed, denatured foods.
  • Electro-magnetic fields and “dirty electrical energy”.
  • Vitamin D shortage.
  • Gut flora dysbiosis.

This is one of the reasons the NVIC avoids aiming to pin any particular vaccine injury on any specific vaccine. Rather the primary thrust of their information project is to just question the wisdom of mandating increasing varieties of youth vaccines in the absence of true knowledge. There are traumatic gaps in vaccine safety science that precludes us from understanding the biological high-risk aspects that make some people more vulnerable than others, for example.

The existing one-size-fits-all vaccine mandates merely throws too many children under the proverbial bus, because we simply do not know what all these vaccines are doing to individuals with different predispositions, or how various vaccines communicate when given in combination.

Bulk of Drug Reactions in Kids are because of Vaccines

While it’s highly unlikely that any one vaccine is accountable for the autism epidemic, there are lots of signs indicating that we might be providing our children a lot of vaccines, which vaccines of all kinds might be less harmless than previously thought.

Case in point: The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) runs a national spontaneous reporting system to gather unfavorable drug response (ADR) information. More than 31,000 ADR reports for children listed below the age of 17 were received in between 2000 and 2009, and vaccines were a factor in more than 66 percent of these pediatric drug reaction reports.

According to a current review in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology:

” Vaccines were consisted of in 22,102 (66.5%) pediatric ADR reports, with Meningococcal Serogroup C conjugate vaccine reported most often (12,106 reports)”.

So here once again, we see yet another vaccine cropping up as being particularly bothersome for kids and teens … It is telling however, that vaccines represent two-thirds of all negative drug responses in the UK, considering how dangerous pediatric drug use can be!


We will be happy to hear your thoughts

      Leave a reply

      This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.