Harmful Ingredients in Toothpaste

Harmful ingredients in toothpaste

You might not think much about the active ingredients in your toothpaste compared with the ingredients in your food or even other personal care products, however those pea-sized dollops on your tooth brush twice a day build up.

Throughout a life time, the average American uses about 20 gallons of toothpaste, and even if you spit most of it out, a few of the chemicals it includes make their method into your bloodstream.

Your mouth is in fact among the most absorbent places in your entire body. This is why some medications are administered sublingually, or under your tongue. While you’re dutifully brushing and swishing, the active ingredients in your toothpaste enter your mouth and gums, which are the gateway to every system in your body.”

This is why you need to be very cautious when picking tooth paste. Lots of popular brands contain questionable ingredients that you’re far better off preventing.

Safe alternative to toothpaste
Safe alternative to toothpaste (miswaak, siwak, sewak)

Safe Alternative to Toothpaste

The miswak (miswaak, siwak, sewak) is a teeth cleaning up branch made from the Salvadora persica tree (referred to as arak in Arabic). A standard and natural alternative to the modern tooth brush, it has a long, well-documented history and is reputed for its medicinal advantages. It is reputed to have been used over 7000 years back.

The miswak’s properties have been explained hence: “Apart from their anti-bacterial activity which may help manage the formation and activity of dental plaque, they can be used effectively as a natural toothbrush for teeth cleaning up. Such sticks work, affordable, common, readily available, and consist of lots of medical properties”.

The miswak is predominant in Muslim-inhabited areas. It is frequently used in the Arabian peninsula, the Horn of Africa, North Africa, parts of the Sahel, the Indian subcontinent, Central Asia and Southeast Asia. In Malaysia, miswak is referred to as Kayu Sugi (Malay for ‘chewing stick’).

Research studies

A 2003 scientific study comparing making use of miswak with regular toothbrushes concluded that the results clearly favored the users who had been using the miswak, provided they had been provided proper instruction in how to brush using it.

Another research study, handling the instant anti-cariogenic impact of the miswak as compared with the tooth brush was done in 2004 with a sample size of 40 people. The effects of miswak were found to be more pronounced and beneficial. Another comparative study concluded “compared with tooth brushing, use of the miswak led to considerable reductions in plaque (p < 0.001) and gingival (p < 0.01) indices”.

The World Health Organization (WHO) suggested using the miswak in 1986, but in 2000 a global consensus report on oral hygiene concluded that more research was had to document the effect of the miswak.

Some of this further research has actually been done on a population of 203, and concluded, in turn, “that the gum status of miswak users in this Sudanese population is much better than that of tooth brush users”. Yet another relative study states performed on a tasting of 480 Saudi Arabian adults found that “the level of requirement for gum care in the sample selected is low when compared to the findings of comparable research studies carried out in other nations. The frequent use of the ‘Miswak’ was associated with a lower requirement for treatment”.

A paper have been published was to measure and profile DNA from siwak and toothbrushes and study the result of time on this procedure. Their conclusion was Miswak includes enough amount of DNA, and kept excellent DNA profiling; when compared with tooth brushes, siwak is an affordable source of DNA profiling when discovered at the scene of criminal offense. In addition, time of storage as much as 4 months had no or little effects on results.

Dr. Rami Mohammed Diabi, who spent more than 17 years investigating the impacts of miswak on health, and particularly its anti-addiction effects on smokers (alleviative and preventive sides), has opened a field of science and research with his last publication: “Miswak Medicine Theory” or Sewak Puncture medicine which led him to what is called Beyond Sewak: World of Science and Research. Miswak likewise is contributing in the battle versus desertification, consequently impacting our environment and international climate.

In addition to strengthening the gums, avoiding dental caries and getting rid of toothaches, the miswak is stated to halt further decay that has actually currently embeded in. Moreover, it is considered to create a fragrance in the mouth, remove bad breath, improve level of sensitivity of taste-buds and promote cleaner teeth.

Toxic Toothpaste Ingredients


The popular tooth paste Colgate Total includes an antibacterial chemical called triclosan, which enables the business to promote it as the “just toothpaste approved by the FDA to help battle plaque and gingivitis.”

Harmful ingredients in toothpaste
Harmful ingredients in toothpaste

However while triclosan has been shown to help avoid gingivitis, the benefit comes at a steep price. The chemical has actually been connected to concerns over antibiotic resistance and endocrine disruption.

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals are a serious concern, as they can promote a wide range of health problems, consisting of breast, ovarian, prostate, and testicular cancer, preterm and low birth weight infants, precocious adolescence in ladies, and undescended testicles in boys.

Some animal research studies revealed that triclosan caused fetal bone malformations in mice and rats, which might hint at hormonal impacts. Even more, triclosan may hinder a type of cell signaling in brain, heart, and other cells, such that scientists noted it “may not deserve prospective dangers.”

The chemical has actually likewise been connected to cancer, with research finding triclosan may promote breast cancer development. The state of Minnesota has actually already banned most uses of triclosan, however it’s still commonly offered across the US in tooth paste, hand soap, makeup, and more.

Tooth paste appears to be one of the most potent delivery lorries for the chemical, as research discovered people who brushed their teeth with Colgate Total had more than 5 times as much triclosan in their urine as those who did not.

Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS)

Lots of harmful ingredients in toothpastes consist of surfactants like salt lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate (SLS), or salt lauryl ether sulfate (SLES). Surfactants are chemicals responsible for the lathering action of the tooth paste, however they likewise hinder the performance of your taste buds by breaking up the phospholipids on your tongue.

This boosts bitter tastes and is thought to be the reason everything tastes so bad right after you’ve brushed your teeth.

Not to discuss, SLS has actually even been linked to skin irritation and painful canker sores, with research recommending an SLS-free tooth paste must be used for individuals with recurring sores.

Nevertheless, among the primary problems with SLS is that the production procedure (ethoxylation) leads to it being possibly contaminated with 1,4 dioxane, a carcinogenic byproduct. The production procedure likewise launches carcinogenic volatile natural substances into the environment.

SLS is likewise signed up as an insecticide and may have poisonous effects to marine life, consisting of fish, bugs, and crustaceans.

The producers really tried to get approval to market SLS as a pesticide for natural farmers, but the application was rejected because of its potential for environmental damage.

Sweetening agents

Aspartame and other sweetening agents are often added to industrial toothpastes. Aspartame is mainly made up of aspartic acid and phenylalanine. The phenylalanine has actually been synthetically modified to carry a methyl group, which supplies most of the sweet taste.

That phenylalanine methyl bond, called a methyl ester, is extremely weak, which allows the methyl group on the phenylalanine to quickly break off and form methanol. You might have heard the claim that aspartame is harmless due to the fact that methanol is likewise discovered in fruits and vegetables.

Nevertheless, in vegetables and fruits, the methanol is firmly bonded to pectin, permitting it to be securely gone through your digestive tract. Not so with the methanol developed by aspartame; there it’s not bonded to anything that can help remove it from your body.

That’s problem top. Problem second relates to the fact that humans are the only mammals who are NOT equipped with a protective biological mechanism that breaks down methanol into harmless formic acid.

In humans, the methyl alcohol travels through your blood vessels into delicate areas, such as your brain, where the methanol is converted to formaldehyde. And since there’s no catalase present, the formaldehyde is free to cause enormous damage in your tissues.

Symptoms from methanol poisoning are numerous, and include headaches, ear ringing, dizziness, nausea, intestinal disruptions, weakness, vertigo, chills, memory lapses, numbness, and shooting pains in the extremities, behavioral disturbances, and neuritis.


Fluoride has long been declared as the response to decomposing teeth, but it’s been getting increasing analysis in recent years, and for good reason. A groundbreaking research study published in the journal Langmuir discovered that the apparently useful fluorapatite layer formed on your teeth from fluoride is a mere 6 nanometers thick.

To understand simply how thin this is, you ‘d require 10,000 of these layers to get the width of a hair of your hair! Researchers now question whether this ultra-thin layer can really safeguard your enamel and supply any noticeable benefit, thinking about that it is quickly eliminated by easy chewing.

In truth, tooth paste that contains the naturally taking place cacao extract theobromine better repaired and re-mineralized exposed dentin (the tissue that makes up the bulk of your teeth below the enamel) than fluoride toothpaste, inning accordance with one research study.

Not to mention, fluoride toothpaste is frequently the biggest single source of fluoride intake for kids and is a major risk element for damaging dental fluorosis. This is since children swallow a big amount of the paste that they put in their mouth.

In truth, research has actually revealed that it is not uncommon for young children to swallow more fluoride from harmful ingredients in toothpaste alone than is advised as an entire day’s consumption from all sources.

Swallowing fluoride, as is the case with fluoridated drinking water, is especially harmful to your health, as the science plainly shows that fluoride is a harmful chemical that builds up in your tissues with time, created chaos with enzymes, and produces a number of serious unfavorable health effects, including neurological and endocrine dysfunction.

Children are particularly at risk for negative effects of too much exposure. If you have a young kid, for that reason, it’s suggested that you use a non-fluoride toothpaste, although I suggest the same for adults too.

Propylene Glycol

Propylene glycol is a type of mineral oil that, in the industrial grade, is used in antifreeze, paints, enamels, and plane de-icers. The pharmaceutical-grade type is used in many individual care products, consisting of tooth paste, as a surfactant. Research on the safety of propylene glycol in individual care products is lacking, although it’s a known skin, eye, and lung irritant and might cause organ system toxicity. This is plainly not a compound you wish to be brushing your teeth with.

Diethanolamine (DEA)

DEA is discovered in numerous lathering products such as tooth paste. It’s a known hormone disrupter and can respond with other active ingredients to form a potential carcinogen called NDEA (N-nitrosodiethanolamine), which is easily absorbed through the skin and has been linked with cancers of the stomach, esophagus, liver, and bladder.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) ranks DEA as a number 10 in its cosmetics database (the most toxic rating) due to high issues of organ system toxicity, contamination issues and irritation, in addition to moderate cancer risk. The California Environmental Protection Agency notes DEA as a possible human carcinogen.


Microbeads are small plastic pellets found in body washes, facial scrubs, tooth paste, and more. The microbeads go down your drain, through the filters at the majority of wastewater treatment plants, and out into the environment. Plastic microbeads absorb contaminants from the water and are eaten by a wide variety of marine life and, ultimately, by human beings too.

There’s good reason to boycott any toothpaste consisting of microbeads, even aside from the obvious environmental threat. In 2015, a Dallas dental hygienist reported discovering the microbeads in patients’ teeth.

The bits were discovered in Crest microbead tooth paste and were getting caught under patients’ gums. This gives food and bacteria an entryway to your gum line, which might actually cause gum disease. Procter & Gamble, that makes Crest, reported they would stop using the microbeads by 2016 as a result.

However while it appears using microbeads is on its escape, the Personal Care Products Council (PCPC) is lobbying to have microbeads made from biodegradable plastic such as polylactic acid (PLA) remain in personal care products.

Good luck! Have a nice weekend.


Health and Welfare
Leave a Reply